Critics’ Reviews

The publication of this book is timely. As with many areas in the medical arena, it is very difficult to understand the terminology. The author has included a chapter explaining in simple terms the medical basis and history of psychiatric conditions and injuries and the use of diagnostic tools …

Throughout the text, the author has provided helpful examples of the concepts and explanations of “tags” often used in this area. This should assist practitioners when seeking to understand medical reports …

The history of the development of liability for psychiatric injury is thoroughly explained. This becomes important … The reader will also be aided by the author expressing his own views on decisions and the impact of [recent] legislative changes. … For Victorian lawyers, a section in Chapter 6 specifically addresses [the amendments to the Wrongs Act]. …

Damages for Psychiatric Injuries gives practitioners a valuable resource [which] can assist in formulating arguments that may influence the courts to develop an appropriate approach to the difficult concepts. – Tim McFarlane, Law Institute (Vic) Journal, Vol 78.10, (October 2004) 66

This is a book which made me feel angry on several occasions and nod in agreement with the author on others! … It raises, considers and ponders much of the present state of the law in Australia and the United Kingdom in relation to the limits on claims for psychiatric injuries.

Do not be mislead into thinking that the only type is PTSD. On the contrary, psychiatric disease can take a myriad of forms and its causation can be something as simple as seeing someone killed or badly injured, to the shock of being told of the death or injury to someone.

Courts, and more recently the legislators have, imposed various limitations on the circumstances in which a person may claim for psychiatric injury and it is in relation to those limits and that legislation, that much of this book gives attention. …

Whereas claims for physical injury are relatively easy to understand, for some reason, our society continues to have great difficulty in cases of psychiatric injury and in identifying an appropriate test for the duty of care and in assessing to whom and in what circumstances therefore, such a duty is to be owed. This book warrants the time and application to read and consider its contents. – BJM, Tasmanian Law Society Newsletter, September 2004

Scroll to Top